Your comment was in regards to your bylaws draft using this as a vehicle to bring it out. Both subjects, skyping and your bylaws draft have their own threads. No reply was made to either previous comment in yours. My staff needs to be able to do their work and be able to share their information without having to work through information irrelevant to the subject. Unless you have a direct response to them then please place your comments in the proper thread and direct further responses to me in a Private Message so that this subject does not get more clogged.
I doubt I'll be able to convince you that I wasn't trying to do that. However it was not my intent to do that. You have also made it a requirement of trying to save public face for me to reply here in this thread, since you continue to make public accusations of me. I did not hyperlink, or even mention the thread my bylaws draft was within, and I fully intended for the meat of my thought to be:
... How exactly should remote votes be verified? I think I have a solution that will work for at least today. I shall post it in the Meeting thread.
Which should be quite relevant to anyone in the Eugene area who has just been told they might be able to Skype in.
At this point, having refuted your last public accusation, I would not inherently be against discussing this or any other subject with you in another forum, including private communication. However I do not personally see any further need for discussion on this matter specifically.
