I wouldn't do it for the Klondike bar. Given solid empirical evidence without reasonable doubt and an opportunity to do so? Certainly.
Would you: approach politics realistically and rationally and argue using factual evidence and descriptive terminology
If I: told you I'd be more open to your views?
(this isn't directed at anyone in particular; it's directed at the world of politics in general, which seems to base itself on association, bureaucracy, and the ridiculous misconceptions generated by the media and by the public's interpretation of it.)