I would really appreciate it if all candidates for a position posted a resume for the given position and maybe a more general introductory statement about themselves and the position they're running for. Hopefully this will also help others make an educated decision on the best candidate for a position.
Hello! I am running for re-election for Convention Chair. I first became Chair mid-term, in January this year. Since I joined Kumoricon staff in 2006, I have previously held two other board positions, Secretary and Director of Publicity, and have held Website Manager continuously since 2007. For my first term, I ran for Chair to fill a vacancy, believing that my experience and knowledge with many areas of the con would help guide us through our next phase.
What do you see the role(s) of the Chair as being, and what do you believe you bring to the table in this regard?
The Chair guides the direction of the convention. The Chair facilitates progress throughout the year, and helps spearhead initiatives that are broader than a single department. The Chair helps represent the convention (though is not the only department doing that) both outside, and at, the con. The Chair is another position to appeal to, if there is a dispute with a department. I believe my extensive experience working on the board and in different areas of the convention - both internally focused, and externally-facing - gives me a depth and breadth of experience to serve these roles.
What's your vision for Kumoricon 2015?
I'd like our convention to continue on its trajectory from the very successful 2014 year, with continued attendee growth, awesome programming, and few attendee complaints.
A big area I'd like to focus on for 2015 is building the strength of our staff - particularly encouraging more staff to join the higher levels of running the con behind the scenes.
To do this, I'd like to become more open about some of our inner workings. I propose distributing our executive meeting minutes, lightly redacted for private details or topics, to all staff of rank Coordinator or above.
I would like the convention to create an online staff wiki where details of how the con is run and how important jobs are done can be more widely shared with staff. This facilitates continuity as staff change positions, and helps staff get involved in areas of the con they may be skilled in, but unaware of. I'd like to start the wiki with a "list of 1000 things you need to do to run an anime convention". In order to encourage delegation, I'd like the org chart to expand to start listing "add-on staff positions" - jobs that are not large enough to justify a staff membership alone, but that can be held at the same time as other positions.
I'd like staff training to take more forms than just the shortly-before-con Yojimbo-style training.
As a disclaimer, any of these changes would be decisions of the board, not the Chair alone, so I cannot absolutely promise them. But these are my vision.
Why do you feel you are the right person for the position?
In addition to the value of the initiatives I described above, I believe I have the experience, time commitment, and motivation for the position.
What's your strategy for uniting a divided board?
First off, I'm not sure such a thing is possible. That said, here are a few thoughts.
I distinguish divisions over substantive issues, and divisions over personalities.
In my observation, Kumoricon has held relatively few
major divisions over substantive issues - "major" meaning that they affect the broad goals and trajectories of the organization. We have a clear and specific mission to put on an annual anime fan convention. This goal is widely understood, and as examples we have conventions in cities across the country to watch and learn from.
Unfortunately, divisions over personalities are common and a drain on everyone. Sometimes these divisions form cliques, and sometimes these disputes over personalities are mistaken for divisions over substantive issues, when they really aren't. Cliques often change or dissolve themselves every 1 to 2 years (if not more often), despite the perception in the heat of the moment that they are long-lasting or eternal. I think these problems are common in nonprofit organizations with boards, and not unique to us, or to anime conventions.
My strategies for dealing with these are: Focus on the merits of the issues, rather than who is saying them. Hear multiple sides of an issue before reaching a decision - and encourage others to do the same, rather than just quickly adopting the opinions of one's friends. Once the board, department, or team decides on a course of action, everyone should work toward the decision of the organization, even if they didn't vote that way or agree. (As a footnote, one reason I have long wanted more of our board positions to move from board-elected to member-elected is to reduce the influence of cliques and personality divisions.)