While I think that this is pretty much a "no-brainer" to most people given the support from staff within the Directorate for the singular candidate. I do think it's important to give the greater staff a better understanding of what makes Sierra such a great option for Director of Publicity.
I don't hold it against Sierra at all if she doesn't see/respond to this as her current transition probably makes it difficult to pin down the time to write an answer to a question this broad, so I hope none of you will either. It's really just for the benefit of us as staff understanding that the community works best when every area is working and happy.
Long Version Question:
Publicity, like many other departments, has had serious growing pains in recent years, and staff at the lower echelons, having their own vision for what Publicity means and does, have felt disconnected from the vision of the board or their Director, and there has been backlash. Knowing that your vision will not always be what the board wants, or what your staff would like, and knowing that the best way to create a cohesive community is to build a brand that doesn't fight OR force change, how do you and the Publicity Staff intend to encourage a future for your department that is cohesive: delegation? democratic concepts of publications and media? unquestioning adherence to Director rule? Baked Good Bribery?
Short Version Question:
History tends to repeat itself, what are you going to do to encourage the Publicity Community doesn't fracture?